landlords2dust ([info]landlords2dust) wrote,
@ 2006-05-03 11:52:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend  Next Entry
REPOST
As a reply to another lj comment, I felt the need to repost this in my own journal. I've been thinking about individualism a lot, and how bourgeois youth tend to fetishize it in order to deal with their non-role in class struggle. In response to comments about indie rock kids in Milwaukee defending Nazis's right to express their opinion, and their free speech. I finally gave some time to respond ......
**************************************************************************

One of the problems with Post-modern american white bourgeois youth is an obsession with their extreme appropriation of individuality which inevitably conflicts with the reality of collectivity. People who can't accept their place in collective life, mask their fears behind facades of individuality. It's a social disease that affects the collective mind. Folks build up a massive collective self-denial about their own collectivity, therefore making their defense of individuality and atomized society comical at best, and completely dangerous at worst. In this case, defending fascists, nazi ideas, etc. are easy to comprehend, it's a natural extension of this delusion of indivuality. In order for people to express their own personal niche within the collective society (which is only about aestheitc and illusion), they are forced to defend everyone's right to do so as well, even if the right to do so means the mass genocide of others. Including themselves. That's what happens when you have bored white middle class boys sitting around coming up with a zillion tendencies of social/anti-social ideas jsut to create their own cool and artistic space in a world of homogeny. THe problem with criticizing capitalism and totalitarian society by viewing its central ills as boredom, consumerist, and homogenous, is that the solution formulates into anti-boredom, anti-comsumerism (or alternacomsumerism), and crass spontaneity, none of which offers paths to heal social wounds, they're only cough suppressants to make us imagine that we're not sick just long enough to continue getting through the mess of life. It's creted such a problem that people actually see action against fascism as being fascistic. Liberalism has won over potential revolutionaries.



(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)


[info]satanscientist
2006-05-03 06:57 pm UTC (link)
You are a wise one, master floyd.

(Reply to this)


[info]flintultrasparc
2006-05-03 07:20 pm UTC (link)
"The problem with criticizing capitalism and totalitarian society by viewing its central ills as boredom, consumerist, and homogenous, is that the solution formulates into anti-boredom, anti-comsumerism (or alternacomsumerism), and crass spontaneity, none of which offers paths to heal social wounds, they're only cough suppressants to make us imagine that we're not sick just long enough to continue getting through the mess of life."

Word.

(Reply to this)


[info]moogerfooger22
2006-05-03 08:26 pm UTC (link)
amen. brilliantly worded.

(Reply to this)


[info]ohmandy
2006-05-04 03:48 pm UTC (link)
reading this i thought, damn i miss having floyd around

(Reply to this)


[info]landlords2dust
2006-05-04 04:22 pm UTC (link)
I miss all you guys. I miss the east coast yo.

(Reply to this)


[info]zer
2006-05-05 06:14 pm UTC (link)
I hear ya.

Aside from the defense of Nazis, which I haven't seen, I see exactly what you're talking about in "the art world" (whatever the hell that is). "Artists" think it's so damn amazing that they're making some kind of self-expression but fail to realize that no one gives a damn except, perhaps, the bored rich people who buy "fine art" (whatever the hell that is). It bugs me the fuck out when radicals talk about 'making art' or how "expressing individuality" itself means a damn thing to anyone else-- capitalists express their kind of individuality just fine (and through buying shitty pomo bohemian crap too), and that 'individuality' sure as hell isn't freeing anyone with its "play" and "spontaneity".

If anything, art needs agitators like Kathe Kollwitz, not pomo wanking. And who else, John Heartfield from around her time was an anti-nazi agitator who made some great stuff. [Kollwitz: http://windshoes.new21.org/art-gallery/kollwitz/st3_1.jpg / Heartfield: http://www.towson.edu/heartfield/images/Heil_Hitler.jpg ]

I know you get lots of flak for not compromising with the pomo-archists, but I'm with ya, they're full of shit.

(Reply to this) (Thread)


[info]landlords2dust
2006-05-05 06:50 pm UTC (link)
fuck yeah

(Reply to this) (Parent)


[info]jimminyjack
2006-05-12 03:40 am UTC (link)
Are you saying that art,music,film etc act as a supressant to political activism? From my limited experience the general impression i get is that Art/science can often act to create something for the benefit of mankind, something that provides people with pleasure and relief (Which is essential)
whereas the chief concern of politics and even the apparent "liberation" of the left wing is to get some kindoff of control over a person, you could argue that the pursuit of art is a more noble (Or at the least, less harmful) way to alleviate the inherent pain of humanity than liberation through an act of human control (and powermongering). To say that art does little to heal social wounds compared to something like union activism seems like a self serving statement, art is universal, yet union based politic seems to appeal to a sense of conflict "Us and Them" "Rich and Poor", perhaps the reason that mass political activism hasnt been adopted by youth culture or society in general is that it simply fails to effect them emotionally and intellectually in the manner of a great work of art, whether it be street art, grindhouse cinema, opera, performance, hip hop or pop music.

(Reply to this)


(8 comments) - (Post a new comment)

Create an Account
Forgot your login or password?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…